Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Swabbie Robbie's avatar

Great post again! The article says Musk: "most people don’t change their mind. They just die. So if they don’t die, we will be stuck with old ideas and society wouldn’t advance." I would think it obvious that in this coming AI world or singularity where us legacy humans are no longer needed that the AI's would, fairly quickly, no longer be able to change their minds or come up with new ideas since their ground of being is the human programing that created them. Apart from programs to maintain themselves, they would lack purpose, just stagnate and their "society" would have no reason to advance. In other words they would die. In their case just sit idle on standby until the power runs out or enough cosmic rays degrade their programs and chips that they can't repair themselves. But, I could be wrong. I am just a carbon based life form. I don't "think" like a silicon based mech form. I still think AI really stands for Algorithmic Mimicry.

Expand full comment
Cynthia Bowers's avatar

Given Elon Musk’s background with a grandfather who loved technocracy I too am skeptical that he has come to save us. (Sarcasm intend.)

Joe have you seen the organizations springing up like the Lifeboat Foundation, which includes many big name scientists and globalists, that purports to exist to ‘save humanity’ but has a division to ensure we treat AI fairly. AI must be given human rights to keep ‘it’ on our side.

https://lifeboat.com/ex/aishield

Expand full comment
28 more comments...

No posts