Though he was obviously astute on some level and to a point, I've always felt that Teilhard de Chardin was a tad misguided and on an empty track - a dead end hidden in the fog that sounded good at the time. As for James Lindsay and O’Fallon, kudos to you for taking that on. In your shoes, I would feel compelled…
Though he was obviously astute on some level and to a point, I've always felt that Teilhard de Chardin was a tad misguided and on an empty track - a dead end hidden in the fog that sounded good at the time. As for James Lindsay and O’Fallon, kudos to you for taking that on. In your shoes, I would feel compelled to turn and run from such grandiose convolution and delusion as quickly as possible. Their expression comes across as sociopathic pseudo-intellectual auto-eroticism to me - oversized mouth, no ears, and scrambled eggs for brains. How do you stand it?
Worthy exploration, thanks!
Though he was obviously astute on some level and to a point, I've always felt that Teilhard de Chardin was a tad misguided and on an empty track - a dead end hidden in the fog that sounded good at the time. As for James Lindsay and O’Fallon, kudos to you for taking that on. In your shoes, I would feel compelled to turn and run from such grandiose convolution and delusion as quickly as possible. Their expression comes across as sociopathic pseudo-intellectual auto-eroticism to me - oversized mouth, no ears, and scrambled eggs for brains. How do you stand it?
Hopefully won't have to concern myself with it too much longer!
Maybe they're right! Only one way to find out (well, only one way I would like to find out).