This must have been very hard to get through Joe? The sacredness of God’s creation soulessly dismissed, & through the differentiation between the technological proponents, as to how humanity benefits, becomes apologetic about the degree of destruction that’s involved. Fundamentally, these people are comfortable in thinking themselves God…
This must have been very hard to get through Joe? The sacredness of God’s creation soulessly dismissed, & through the differentiation between the technological proponents, as to how humanity benefits, becomes apologetic about the degree of destruction that’s involved. Fundamentally, these people are comfortable in thinking themselves God equivalent, & as though you may have been there ahead of me, well before you got to your last couple of sentences, I thought to myself that in light of these concepts, I’m very happy to be thought a “Luddite”, then “Voila”, I got through to your summary! Thanks again Joe, spot on as usual!
This must have been very hard to get through Joe? The sacredness of God’s creation soulessly dismissed, & through the differentiation between the technological proponents, as to how humanity benefits, becomes apologetic about the degree of destruction that’s involved. Fundamentally, these people are comfortable in thinking themselves God equivalent, & as though you may have been there ahead of me, well before you got to your last couple of sentences, I thought to myself that in light of these concepts, I’m very happy to be thought a “Luddite”, then “Voila”, I got through to your summary! Thanks again Joe, spot on as usual!
Thank you, Pat!
Yeah, man, the whole book was a slog.
But worth it! (I think.)